Fairness? Who Needs Fairness?: Vancouver’s New Liquor By-Laws

Posted by

bigbroThe City of Vancouver took aim at the heart of Vancouver’s restaurant industry two weeks ago with the introduction of by-law amendments that could have the effect of putting numerous restaurants out of business or forcing them to create unsustainable business models.

The tabled by-law amendments came amongst the more positive announcement that Vancouver was extending late-night licenses for some establishments that served primarily liquor. However, these amendments are seriously biased against the food primary establishments. Given how much Vancouverites love their food culture, this will come as a shock to many. Here are some of the amendments:

1. The 20% of food primary restaurants that have existing licenses to close later than 1am will be required by the City as of January 1st, 2010 to close at 1am on weekdays and 2am on weekends, effectively stripping these restaurants of a portion of their licenses, for which they undoubtedly paid a premium. No ‘grandfather’ clauses will qualify.

2. All restaurants, under the new by-laws, will be required to sell as much food as alcohol, and drinks can only be served with a meal. Read this last sentence very carefully because the out-dated 50/50 rule is back to put every single restaurant serving alcohol in contravention of their liquor license on a regular basis. The days of ordering a quality bottle of wine would be over, by law.

This last point affects every restaurant, be it casual dining, fine dining, corporate chain or otherwise, and furthermore Counci plans to eliminate any past loop holes by changing the previous 24 hour sampling to an 8 hour sampling.

3. The cost of City-issued business licenses will be increased to pay for the bureaucracy required to make these changes. Every food primary restaurant will also be subject to an annual $3.00 fee. The total amount of money this raises, somewhere in the neighbourhood of $450,000 annually, will be spent entirely on a new task force of inspectors whose sole mandate will be to enforce the 50/50 law. These ‘food police’ not only have the power they need to fine or suspend restaurants by way of their business licenses, but Council have also passed a measure without public consultation allowing them to raise the penalties to $15,000 for a contravention.

This is yet another example of government bureaucracies getting it all wrong. Why punish food primary restaurants with puritanical and ludicrous laws that lack both logic and fairness? Doesn’t this prove that bureaucrats are unable to make effective decisions when it comes to liquor licensing and distribution in the province? Will this by-law have the effect of increasing the already steady rate of restaurant closures in Vancouver given the poor economy? Hopefully this by-law amendment will never get the force of law and I hope that the restaurant industry and consumers can put enough pressure on the City to abandon this ludicrous law.

Posted in: Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Shea
    October 27, 2009

    I know, it’s disturbing. So much so that I’d even consider moving out of town if this stupidity moves forward.

  2. Corey Allan Hawkins
    May 12, 2010

    Vancouver Council has introduced a 10 year plan to fix this problem. I’m not sure why it’s taking them 10 years to do something about it, but by 2018 they say the problem of “no fun city” will be solved and the liquor licenses will be changed.

    Head to my website to read all about an article I have just written on the subject.

    Love what you’re doing here as well.

  3. Shea
    May 13, 2010

    Corey,

    Anyone who says it takes a 10 year plan to have fun has clearly lost any sense of it a long time ago.

  4. no fun city
    May 20, 2010

    What has happened to Vancouver?
    It has becoming very puritancial in it’s by-laws/culture.
    No fireworks,no indy racing,no PNE parade,
    no smoking at beaches/parks,etc…It’s very anti-small business as well.
    When I visit other countries & mention Vancouver,
    they say:”No Fun City” & laugh.
    It’s a good thing I left vancouver for another city…

  1. uberVU - social comments - Social comments and analytics for this post... This post was mentioned on Twitter by vinifico: @JustGrapesWine already has a good…
  2. Word on the Street: Vancouver City Council is Stupid « Just Grapes - [...] The buzz online and on the street now is that Vancouver City Council has decided to go back on…

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>