Archive for the ‘Features’ Category

B.C. Wine and the Ideology of Quality

With my series on B.C. wines over the Olympics I’ve done something I have never really done before – I’ve reviewed free samples sent to me by wineries. My logic behind this practice was as follows:

1. Arg, the Olympics is coming, how will I get to work?

2. Well I guess a lot of people will be celebrating B.C. during the Olympics – that’s good.

3. Wait, why are all Olympic venues dominated by large multi-national corporations?

4. No one will be celebrating what is truly B.C. during the Olympics!!

5. What can I do?

6. Well, I don’t usually enjoy or drink that many B.C. wines, but perhaps it’s time to do a profile on B.C. wineries during the Olympics.

7. But, I can’t really afford to pay for wines that I wouldn’t normally drink. I have a limited budget and like to spend it on things I’m excited about.

8. Hm, well since I’m going to put a ton of effort into researching, reviewing and writing about these wines, maybe the wineries will just send me samples. It seems fair and reasonable.

9. Ok, I’ll do it – at least to give the small guys a voice during the Olympics.

During this process I’ve been reading a lot of opinions and criticism about wine writing in both the traditional media and blogging. Complaints about bias and lack of integrity abound in the world of wine lovers and industry types. What are some of these concerns?

• Wineries and wine associations pay for free trips of wine writers and those connected in the industry. How can these individuals offer fair and unbiased opinions?

• Corporate interests are dominating the public’s access to and appreciation of wine. There are no real venues in B.C. to market and share small artisanal and family producers that are kicking the SH*!()$* out of the big guys in terms of quality.

• Some wine bloggers never write negative reviews, and simply lap up samples of low quality wine and shill them on the public in puff pieces.

• Some wine publications do exactly the same thing.

No one likes to be unpopular. It’s tough to be truly and fairly critical – to strike the balance between accuracy, fairness, and honest opinion. It’s also tough, as an amateur and in a media environment where advertising dollars are flushing down the drain, to afford to taste and drink the 1000’s of wine it is necessary to drink to educate your palate. The more I think of it, the more I realize that it is costly and risky to have integrity as a writer and journalist – but it is just these sorts of people that we need to support.

My philosophy is simple – one should be independent (fiercely so) and one should not be writing about wine if one’s career depends on connections within the industry and if one can advance their career by being sycophantic. These are just principles of journalistic integrity, much of which is depleting as it is more and more difficult for news agencies to be independent from corporate interests.

There is also the sheer ridiculousness of writing about wine based on tasting through 100’s of wines at tastings and press events. Now, I appreciate these events for what they are for providing a means to educate my palate – but to be honest, I never really understand or appreciate wine unless I’m sitting down drinking it with a meal or just sipping it during good conversation. You know, like most people do when they actually drink the wine we write about.

Now, this leads me, somewhat as a digression I suppose, into the Ideology of Quality. When I received these samples for the B.C. wine tasting, I also received marketing materials. Here is a common theme in the marketing materials:

• This winery was founded on passion and love for the vine.
• We believe in putting the best efforts into our vines and wines.
• We believe these are some of the best wines of the type in the world!
• Look at all the awards we’ve won!

In addition to these common themes, some more specific brands of the Ideology of Quality are:

• We believe in minimal intervention.
• We let the fruit speak for itself.
• We use extremely low yields.
• We want the land to speak through in our wines.
• We use the most advanced techniques possible to produce authentic high quality wines.
• Look at all the awards we’ve won!

Here are a few things I know. “Minimal intervention” is a near meaningless phrase in itself. What is minimal? Wine making IS intervention in nature. Minimal is meaningless. What matters are the particular choices you make when you grow, harvest, and vinify grapes. It’s not a question of no interference and much interference, it is a question of your philosophy of production – of your approach to creation and the process of human interaction with nature. Ya, so that’s meaningless and yet it’s used on consumers all the time.

“We let the fruit speak for itself”. Wha? Ok, but you also crush it, and stick it in vats and use yeast to ferment the crushed grapes into an alcoholic beverage, and you probably add sulphur and oak, etc. And yet, these words are commonly spoken to the average wine buyer or winery visitor. Again, it doesn’t really mean anything.

Passion for the vine. Ok, that’s great. But, this phrase is now a cliché, which means it is devoid of particular meaning. If you want to use the word passion and wine together, you better tell me what you mean by passion.

I can’t even go on with this list because it is so frustrating. What happened to quiet confidence. Since when have marketers and marketing lingo infected the wine world to such an extent that everyone is afraid to be distinct from each other? We might stand out!? But, what if no one likes us? I just had a flash back of my first high school dance.

So, this ideology of quality seems to promote the ideal that “minimal intervention”, “passion”, “low-yields”, etc. are markers of quality. But there is very little discussion of philosophical and human motivations beyond “passion”. I begin to suspect the sincerity of these sorts of proclamations when I learn that recently no wineries in B.C. expressed an interest in learning from an expert on biodynamics from France who was willing to come into the province and share his knowledge – not a single winery.

I’m suspect of a winery that can’t express itself any more effectively than “we just try to make the best wine possible.” Since, in the end, what is possible and what is to be hoped for are intricately entwined – and the last time I checked hope is a fairly multivalent concept and one that, in any effective way, cannot arise from hubris. It is integrity and humility that produce the most effective hope, and the most diverse possibilities.

So how do all these ideas link together? One simple phrase: the Ideology of Quality. Whether via a wine writer, marketer, or winery itself, the wine world seems afraid to deviate from a standard vocabulary and semantics for expressing wine quality (points-based rating systems are another culprit here). Instead, true expression is captured by other interests, by biases, by marketing, by the desire to fit in and sell wine. Of course, underlying all this is a most fundamental human instinct: survival.

So much of the wine world seems to be caught up in its own survival. Unsuccessful writers dine on Kraft Dinner each night while the successful ones try to protect their interests (and massive cellars of free wine) and avoid that dilemma by folding their personality and expertise into a pre-formed model. Once you’ve breached that inner circle, it’s like a pack instinct to keep out all pretenders to the throne.

Wineries? Well, they’re scared shitless that they’ll never make back their initial investments. Others are doing very well and are simply trying to diversify and spread their brand. But, they seem afraid that if they go off-message they might jeopardize the basis for their success. I am no stranger to these feelings – that is what it is like to have a career and try to survive in the business world.

But, what gets lost in this giant race is distinct and particular expression: real thoughts about wine, effective criticism, small producers who either don’t understand the game or simply don’t want to join it. There must be a better environment within which one of the world’s most profound agricultural products can be explored, loved, and discovered. We are all far too concerned with our own survival and the ideology of quality to actually and humbly discover how to best entwine ourselves with the ‘natural’ world through wine. We are part of that ‘natural’ process – but we are vacating this meaning from ourselves with each puff piece, marketing blurb, and cliché.

So, while I plan on continuing writing profiles on B.C. wineries for the sake of the industry and the small guy, I have to come out and say that I still have tremendous difficulty saying that B.C. wine is at the same level as the great wines of the world, of all types from weekday meal wines to wines for 50th wedding anniversaries. B.C., with the exception of a very few producers, is still too caught up in the Ideology of Quality to actualize its potential. Right now it is just trying to “make the best wine possible” – but it has homogenized the hope that gives meaning to possibility. Until wineries take that next step and are bold enough both to have their own voice and beliefs, but also humble enough to listen and learn from others, we will languish where so much of the world’s wine languishes – in mediocrity.

5 Comments


Trade law and Constitutional Challenges: Why the BC Wine Industry Needs to Worry Now

Mark Hicken, a lawyer here in Vancouver, recently wrote an article on how Canada’s trade obligations under NAFTA and GATT are being violated by the current BC liquor monopoly system. He forecasts that because the distribution and markup systems treat imported wine differently from domestic wine, that this could be the basis for a NAFTA and GATT challenge.

Furthermore, many legal experts knowledgeable about wine law believe that the federal Importation of Intoxicating Liquors Act is unconstitutional. Since this act not only prevents BC wineries from shipping direct to other provinces but is also the legal basis for provincial liquor monopolies, a legal challenge will likely result in a massive shakeup of the current liquor monopoly.

While this is good for consumers, it will be bad for BC wineries since they rely on the competitive advantage given to them by the current system. Mark argues that without a large reform of the system now, if NAFTA and GATT challenges or a constitutional challenge is successful, the resulting shakeup of the BC liquor monopoly could seriously impair a BC winery’s ability to compete in the market. What is needed, Mark argues, is back-end assistance to supplement the high costs of BC wine production, and a reform of the liquor distribution system.

This is a fascinating article and, in my opinion, prescient of the future of wine law in BC. If something isn’t done soon, the entire system could unravel and both consumers and BC winery owners will have a lot to worry about. Reform is necessary NOW, as a proactive approach to solving this problem. A reactive approach will surely end up in the death of many businesses in our province. To read the full article, go here.

8 Comments


Social Media, Social Process and the Content Delivery Dilemma

In this article I want to talk about something that is not just limited to the wine industry, but that will become an important factor for all businesses engaged in social media. This is: how are we to effectively engage in a technology that’s visibility is beginning to exceed its maturity. How are we to see through the morass of information to understand the underlying phenomenon that we are dealing with. And, most importantly, how can we predict what all of this new technology will mean in the future.

A common analogy to describe the creation and adoption of new technologies is known as the “hype cycle”, developed by the Garner Group. It looks something like this:

GartnerHypeCycle

One of the big critiques of this model is that it hypothesizes a static cause-effect relationship between the creation of technology and its adoption. There are many examples, such as fuel cells, of technology that has never been adopted into the mainstream. Jim Bullock at the 2003 Aye Conference hypothesized that technology adoption actually derives from the confluence of two vectors: 1. the social process, and 2. the delivery process. The social process is about people and their expectations whereas the delivery process is about the availability of the technology itself. Most technologies rely on other technologies to be successful, just as, for instance, social media relies not just on computing, but also on portable computing and, increasingly, smart phones.

The dilemma I want to talk about in this article relates to the first vector of technology adoption hypothesized by Mr. Bullock: the social process. This relies on a few presuppositions.

Firstly, these days it is cheap to get content to people. The costs of entry are minimal with electronic publishing, whether in a blog, via twitter, facebook or other social media services, being mostly free. Second, there are two basic kinds of social networks: open networks and closed networks. Open networks do not limit access by filtering individuals based on specific interests or commonalities. Twitter is the de facto example of an open network. Closed networks limit access by focusing on commonalities or interest. Facebook is the most important example of this, but also consider social media sites that focus on wine, like Cork’d, which are explicitly designed to facilitate dialogue amongst a select group of people.

Here’s my thesis: the differentiation between content delivery in open and closed networks is about the social process. Closed networks provide a clear set of tools that guide user’s expectations, and provide them with an easily digestible means to connect and share content. No one is confused about the purpose of Facebook: upon signing up the website asks you to enter your email address to find your friends.

Open networks, on the other hand, provide a limited set of tools to guide the user. Twitter does not build in expectations into its functionality, but instead relies on the user to figure out how to use it and how to interact with others. Twitter requires a more sustained effort to understand than a service like Facebook, which is why so many businesses fail to utilize twitter effectively.

Now, when considering the differing social expectations created by Facebook and Twitter one can notice the fundamental impact these expectations have on the nature of content delivery in these two networks. Facebook, while setting expectations firmly and clearly, limits the diversity of its content delivery to what people expect to read and hear from their friends. Hence, advertising on Facebook is of the traditional non-interactive sort. Intrusive advertising, no matter how well targeted it is, is a necessary consequence of Facebook’s closed nature. People put up with this advertising because the Facebook network has reached such a critical mass that, to put it in economic terms, the costs of not participating are far higher for most people than the costs of viewing intrusive advertising.

Twitter does not operate this way. Because expectations are diffuse and unclear, twitter effectively has no rules for managing content delivery. Even if, over time, we begin to see Twitter using intrusive advertising, this is not the real future of content delivery on open networks. Instead, open networks such as Twitter’s true power is in allowing more diffuse and less intrusive content delivery for businesses. Twitter’s weakness is in scoping and channeling content into easily understandable chunks and in providing guidance for its users.

Thus, if we return to the “hype curve” above, it is only possible to understand social media’s place on this curve if we divide it into social process and delivery process. Right now, the delivery process is peaking, and, may in fact actually be maturing. As newspapers die, content becomes easier and easier to produce to such an extent that almost everyone knows how to and does produce content online, thus making the delivery process nearly ubiquitous.

On the other hand, the social process has yet to mature as fully as the delivery process. Social and personal expectations about social media are not cohesive. Additionally, the delivery processes have fragmented the social processes to such an extent that many Facebook users simply don’t understand or don’t find a use for services such as Twitter and many Twitter junkies are tired and bored of Facebook and its limitations.

If the “hype curve” is at all accurate in relation to social media, then it is only accurate if we increase the number of data points and the number of axes on which to plot the development of the technology. Thus, social media is not just about visibility and maturity; it is also about social expectations, the lost third axis. By plotting along these three axes we can get a better image of the future of social media.

My first thesis that the differentiation between content delivery in open and closed networks is about the social process leads me to the prediction that the future of social media will merge the guidance element of closed networks with the diffusion element of open networks. I believe that Foursquare is an early attempt to achieve this combination of factors, but that its interactive capabilities need to be enhanced.

Thus, the content delivery dilemma in social media is not about the cost of delivery any more. Rather, the dilemma is about the method of delivery. Content is so easy and cheap to produce that users need interfaces that guide them through the sheer volume of material and provide them with guideposts on not just how to manage content, but, more importantly, how to produce it.

A mature understanding of the social process that underlies the development of social media will allow a visionary firm to go beyond traditional monetization and intrusive advertising. In the future, the most successful networks will figure out how to leverage word of mouth marketing within a model of content guidance and signposting within an open network. This will allow for word of mouth marketing to become more important and more targeted than traditional marketing. It will also converge the benefits of visibility with the benefits of social expectations. It is only then that social media will reach the first stages of its maturity.

2 Comments


ZAP Contest Winners

The draw is now complete, and the winners of a pair of tickets to San Francisco’s ZAP Zinfandel Festival are:

1. Craig Gummer   [NB: original winner Steve Paulo from Walnut Creek, California was unable to attend]

and

2. Kevin Whitaker from Scottsdale, Arizona

Congrats to both! And thanks to all who participated in the contest. This year’s festival is sure to be an outstanding event.

No Comments


The Millennial Quotient: How 21-35 Year Olds Are Changing The Wine World

MillennialsMillennials are hot in the wine world right now. Everyone is talking about us and trying to figure out how to sell to us. Recent data shows that Millennials are consuming more and better wine at a younger age than their parents’ generation, but no one seems sure what this trend means and where it is going to go. Marketers often try to tap into the trend, but few do so successfully. Witness the collapse of Roshambo winery in Napa (Alder over at Vinography has a great article on it) whose marketing was designed to target this age group, but whose business model ultimately failed.

Why is everyone failing to understand this demographic? For one, I don’t think that Millennials all fit into the same pattern – there are definite segments with distinct qualities. However, what I want to write about here is the segment of Millennials who are starting to think of and treat wine as more than a vessel for alcohol delivery, but who are becoming genuinely interested in exploring what goes on behind the bottle and who are starting to associate wine with food.

From my perspective, there are ten characteristics of this group that thus far marketers have poorly understood. Keep in mind that my opinion is based entirely on personal experience and reflection and not on market research. I encourage debate and reflection on this issue more generally. Here’s what I think (in no particular order):

1. We care about process.

With the increasing importance of movements such as the slow food movement and initiatives that focus on understanding the source of food rather than simply the end product, Millennials are becoming increasingly interested in understanding the process behind what we are consuming. We are ever curious about biodynamics, organics, vineyard practices and additives. Wine labeling is far behind the trend on this issue, but when and if it ever catches up, Millennials will be checking them just as fastidiously as food labels. More and more certifications will start to develop and these will hold sway so long as they gain respect in the community.

2. We care about the small guy.

We don’t tend to believe in big corporations anymore. We don’t like to support them, particularly when it comes to agricultural products. As more and more Millennials begin to understand that wine is an agricultural product, their support for small producers and farmers will increase. Of course, major brands that sell wine cheaply will still prosper; however, there is a huge open niche for small producers if they market themselves correctly and reach out to the Millennial generation.

3. We don’t mind spending money, but we want to feel ‘honest’ value at any price point.

Marketers often make the mistake that Millennials want the cheapest option possible. That is not the case. Millennials see wine as coincident with food, and often bring it over to friend’s places as guests. No one wants to be the cheap guest; everyone wants to impress their friends at the party with a carefully thought out (or really good) selection of wine. Wineries who make the assumption that Millennials care about price more than quality are simply missing the boat. Both price and quality matter to this growing segment of wine appreciators.

4. We have growing skepticism for commercial wine scores.

Millennials don’t like to be told what to do. Wine scores are convenient, but this emerging group of wine appreciators is caring less and less about them. New services such as Cellar Tracker, blogs, and good old word of mouth, fuel wine sales within this demographic just as much as scores do. And, with time, the value of commercial scores will continue to diminish.

5. We see wine as community and conversation, not prestige.

Again, social media is not something you can just jump into and succeed at. Underlying social media is the basic tenet that Millennials see wine as a community building enterprise, and one that fosters conversation. We care far less about the prestige of a particular wine or wine region, and far more about new exciting discoveries made through friends. That, and we see wine as a vessel for community rather than simply a product to consume.

6. We think of wine as personal discovery.

Just as much as Millennials see wine as community, we also see it as part of personal discovery. Finding the wines you love, and the styles that resonate with you is part of building a Millennial’s sense of personal style and sense of self. We actually don’t want to be the same as everyone else; rather, we want what we consume to feel individualized and an honest expression of what we care about.

7. We like to think of wine as our own culture and not benefiting from the cache of others.

Millennial wine appreciators in North America are not buying wine for the cache of a particular region. While French wine remains popular, it is not because we are buying into the prestige of French culture. Instead, Millennials like wine to express and become part of their own culture, wherever we are from. This helps to explain the popularity of the BC wine industry with young BC wine drinkers. However, BC wineries that try to rely simply on local pride and not consider all the other factors that make wine drinking Millennials tick will fail to properly tap into this market segment. Don’t forget, we care about QPR, process, and honesty too.

8. We see wine as multivalent and not univalent.

Similar to how wine scores are diminishing in importance, Millennials tend to see wines as having many meanings and possible interpretations. We don’t really care about accurately describing a wine along some rigid objective line. We appreciate a diversity of opinions and thoughts. But, this does not mean we are simple relativists. No, Millennials also have a great respect for knowledge, and care tremendously about why things are the way they are. We just don’t think there is one answer to the question.

9. We believe in principles and knowledge, but not rules and rankings [plus don't talk down to us].

This is an extension of the last point. Certain things can be understood objectively, other things cannot. Millennials do believe that certain principles and knowledge are useful to know in wine appreciation. However, we don’t care so much for rules and rankings – we just don’t find them useful in understanding wine. Again, if wine is just as much cultural and community based as technical and flavor based, then rules based entirely on the latter factors will simply alienate Millennials. Give us basic principles to work with that still allow us to develop community and pursue personal discovery? Well, then we’re all for it.

10. We prefer branding as story and not as message.

This is the biggest mistake of marketing to Millennials in the wine world today. Don’t talk down to us, and don’t try to create phony lifestyle branding for your wines. Instead, find (not create) an honest story and tell it with panache. Doing this successfully taps into all the other factors I’ve discussed above, and helps to build a personal connection between your brand and the Millennial customer. We like attention, but we also like freedom and respect. Respect our freedom, but give us something on which to work that freedom and you will start building some pretty loyal customers.

13 Comments


The Wine Store as Community: A Forgotten Side of Wine Marketing

wine_store_racksOne of the unsung heroes (or villains) in the wine industry is the local store owner and staff. These guys are the front line soldiers in capturing new consumers in the wine industry and helping people learn to trust and explore their palate. Why, then, are they so often ignored in debates about wine appreciation and market share? And, what can local stores do not only to improve their bottom line, but also to contribute to the wine community in more ways than simply making a buck.

Have you ever entered a wine store excited to find something new and enticing only to be confronted by lackadaisical staff or an overwhelming disorganization of bottles? At their worst, wine stores can actually dissuade consumer appreciation. Poor staffing and lack of passion leads people to buy the same old thing or simply choose a bottle at random. Without context, a wine bottle means very little to the average consumer, and even expert consumers will often benefit greatly from passionate input and discussion. This leads me to my first point.

reviewWine stores should not just be ports of call for the thirsty, but rather should foster a community of passionate wine lovers who enjoy each other’s company. The best wine stores are those that provide a personal touch to their stores that makes people want to come in and talk. First of all, forget shelf talkers unless you write them yourself. And, while in Canada it is illegal to have a wine bar in your store, it is possible to hold occasional tastings on premises. Additionally, staff should be trained to engage with the consumer and start up a conversation. I know I’ve spent many an hour in my favourite wine stores discussing wine with the staff. This not only usually results in me buying more wine than I should, it also makes me want to come back. This is not only good for the wine store, but also for the wine industry, who benefit greatly when consumers learn to trust and expand their palate.

These days social media is becoming one of the most important marketing tools in the wine industry. Wineries can now market direct to consumer and engage with them on a personal level. This same philosophy applies to wine stores. If you run a store you need to consider how you are using these tools to engage with your customers. Imagine the benefits of direct feedback and the huge increase in customer service that attentive social media marketing accomplishes. In my mind, great customer service will result in great word of mouth, expanding both your niche and the breadth of customer appreciation. I know from experience that I will recommend wine newbies go to the stores with the best customer service since this is the best way for them to start engaging with the world of wine. Wine, after all, is all about the people.

I suspect the wine store dimension has been neglected and misunderstood by marketers because they have failed to understand a wine store for what it truly is. Traditionally, marketers try to get good product placement (most visible) by utilizing shelf space, shelf talkers, marketing events, and catchy labels. Marketers expect consumers to go into the store, get the bottle that is the easiest to see and displayed most prominently, look at the label, and perhaps read the marketing blurb on the back or on the shelf talker. Of course, marketers also rely on “points” to sell wine, with many retailers posting the scores of a wine by Robert Parker, Wine Spectator, etc. But this entirely misses the point.

Wine stores, at their best, are communities, not message boards. As much as wine drinkers still rely on points, labels, and shelf placement, this is the fault of poorly run stores. These stores are simply working to help promote mass market and uninteresting wine. A community based store, on the other hand, will build relationships directly with consumers and engage them in conversation. Shelf space has nothing on great word of mouth, and the passionate clerk who waxes poetical about the great Gruner Veltliner he just had will end up selling a broader array of wines to a broader base of customers.

Marketers for the big brands don’t concern themselves that much with this, since they rely on statistics and market research. With limits on resources, the little guys have very little opportunity to do the same. They need new strategies and more thoughtful approaches.

So what’s the bottom line? If you are a small winery looking to grow your customer base, use social media to establish direct relationships with consumers, but also don’t forget about how wine stores can help capture consumers you would otherwise not be able to reach. Help wine stores promote your brand by establishing personal relationships with the best, holding tastings, and otherwise providing as many opportunities as possible for the staff to get to know you and your wines. Offer customers opportunities to visit your winery or attend special tastings. This will help to grow sales through word of mouth and capture customers that will get to know you and your wines rather than buying based on score or inclination. These are the customers that will hold your business together when times are tough. Accordingly, they are the “core” of your winery and you should put every effort you can into keeping them engaged. Wine stores, for all their faults, are part of this equation. Find the good ones, and build that relationship.

And for wine stores? Don’t treat your customers like ignoramuses. Engage them, talk to them, and make them part of your store’s community. Doing otherwise is just bad business.

12 Comments


Contest: Win Two Tickets to ZAP Zinfandel Festival in San Francisco

zapI am giving away two pairs of tickets to the Grand Tasting at the ZAP Zinfandel Festival at the Fort Mason Center in San Francisco on Saturday, January 30, 2010. This is the best zinfandel event in North America. I went last year and it was absolutely fantastic, even if you think you are not into zinfandel. At last year’s festival I tasted 100’s of zinfandels and gained a new appreciation for the grape. Not to mention the event is held at a venue close to the Golden Gate Bridge in one of my favorite cities in the world! For more details on the event go here. And for my writeup on last year’s event go here.

Here’s how you can win:

Between today and January 23, tweet the following to your followers on twitter (make an account if you don’t already have one):

I want to win 2 tickets to the ZAP Zinfandel Festival in San Francisco from @justgrapeswine Go to http://tinyurl.com/yg4ynst for details

Each tweet will give you one “ticket” in a draw to win a free pair of tickets to the Grand Tasting, valued at $120 USD! So the more you tweet, the better chance you have to win. There is a maximum of one tweet per day.

On January 24 I will draw two names, each of whom will win a pair of tickets to the Grand Tasting event in San Francisco. That’s all there is to it. Good luck!

Note: this contest is for the entry tickets to the event only. Travel and other costs are not covered.

2 Comments


My Top Wines of 2009

Best of lists are common running from this time of year (just in time for shopping!), until the New Year. Mostly they are attempts at telling you what to buy, at reviewing the year gone past and the achievements accomplished over it. Inevitably they focus on things that you can readily grab at the store.

I’m not all that into such lists, although I do admit to a morbid curiosity at Wine Spectator’s Yearly top 100, which has such a large impact on wine sales and winery reputations. However, I do like the idea of thoughtful contemplation over a year’s past experiences and both what made them so interesting and how they informed your choices and opinions in the future. And, really, there’s something inherently fun about geeky lists, as we all learned in High Fidelity. Right?

Well my top wines of 2009 list focuses on the wines that made the most personal impact on me in my wine drinking experience. Wines that challenged my perceptions, made me think twice, or just stopped me in my tracks. Each of these wines has had a significant impact on the way I think of wine and has accordingly enriched my relationship to this ancient fermented beverage. And, considering this year I tasted well over 1000 wines, lived in California for 5 months, and attended a great many tastings, making this list has become a lot harder than it used to be. Here we go…

xmas

10. Movia Ribolla 2005

Movia, a Slovenian wine producer close to Italy’s Friuli, not only plays with well-known grapes in ways I found exceptional (taste their Pinot Grigio), but have also brought this rare variety to new heights. Ribolla, a white grape, originated in Greece, but over the centuries found its way to Italy, where it now sees its most well known renditions, through trading. Movia is also a biodynamic winery, and that’s something I started exploring quite a bit this year. Biodynamics certainly can seem hokey, with agricultural practices linked to lunar cycles and crazy formulas for creating fertalizer such as aging compost in bull’s horns. I was pretty skeptical when I first heard about this practice. However, tasting wines like Movia’s Ribolla show the sort of stunning results that keep coming from the best biodynamic producers. I don’t have science to back this up, but experience has been showing me that biodynamics is producing wines to watch. This Ribolla was also just so unique and interesting with all sorts of cool flavours like bark, cardamom, stone, mineral and lavender. And, it had all this complexity along with oak aging and the vanilla flavours that go along with this. Kind of a mad-scientist wine, and oh ya, I loved it. $35 at Kits Wine Cellar.

9. Mastroberardino Radici Taurasi Riserva 1999

I grabbed this off the shelf just because I wanted to try a really old Aglianico. Little did I expect this wine to completely transform my perceptions of the Aglianico grape and turn my fledgling curiosity with Southern Italy into a full blown passion. This is the sort of wine I want to drink all the time. It’s got amazing acidity – something I find myself driving towards more and more – but also tons of red fruits and stunningly dense secondary flavours like cigar and spice. The acidity makes this great with all sorts of foods, but I think that such a stunning wine as this pairs most beautifully with a simple pizza made in the Napoli tradition. It’s a pairing that reconfirmed to me the simple beauty of regional pairings. I also think this is the perfect wine for when you feel both like old world and new world and you just want something really tasty with your dinner. One of the coolest reds I had this year hands down. $82 at Kitsilano Wine Cellars.

8. Domaine de la Noblaie Chenin Blanc Chinon 2007

Graham brought this to the YVR Wine group’s Loire tasting and I was immediately blown away by its uniqueness and sheer vibrancy. This had great acid without cutting your gums, but it also brought incredible notes of apricot – almost like a purer expression of that flavour than the fruit itself. And, given that Chinon is known for Cabernet Franc, the quality of this white wine was even more exciting. I also chose this wine because this year is the year that the Loire Valley has become one of my favourite wine regions in the world, thanks, in part, to wines like this. And, ya, look at the price – this kills wines coming in at 3x as much. I bought another bottle of this when I went down to Seattle recently because it blew mw away so much. Thanks Graham. $20 at Esquin.

7. Pascal Cotat La Grande Cote Sancerre 2006

Another wine from the Loire? That’s right. Sancerre is, of course, the big boy in the Loire and the wines tend to be more expensive than normal. But that didn’t stop this Sauvignon Blanc from being an utter masterpiece of the genre. This had probably one of the most complex mineral driven palates I have ever experienced with Sauvignon Blanc and it had an otherworldly ability to pair with one of my favourite, and signature, dishes: lemon, asparagus, chevre, sage, rosemary risotto. Somehow this wine picked up every element of that dish while maintaining its profundity and expressive capacity. It, somehow, made me even more obsessed with the Loire than I was after the YVR tasting. $70 at BCLDB and Kits (I got this for $45 on sale at BCLDB)

6. Beckmen Purisima 2005

The Purisima is Beckmen’s top red blend, made with 60% Grenache and 40% Syrah and picked from the best blocks of Beckmen’s Purisima Mountain Vineyards. So why is this special? Well, in a year where I spent a good 5 months exploring the terrain of Californian wine, and taking my first trip to Santa Barbara County, where I tried (and bought) this wine at the winery, this was one of the very few that stood out to me as something distinct. It’s amazing, really, considering how many wines I had in California that I liked, that upon reflection it was hard to choose any for this top 10 list. Beckmen made it because of this wine’s honesty and ability to show a distinct style for the region without worrying about pleasing the masses. I’m sure many would enjoy this wine, but it has such tremendous structure underneath all its flavour that this will be a stunning Grenache heavy wine to taste in 10 years. You can’t say that for most wines from central California. An extremely solid top 10 pick and one of the best wines I have yet had from California. $75 at the Winery.

5. Domaine Courbis Les Eygats Cornas 2004

Syrah is one of my three great passions in wine, the other two being Loire whites and white Burgundy, and amazingly, this was the only Syrah to make the list this year. Why is that? Well I have a lot of great syrah, and there are many I would recommend as fantastic that I had this year other than this wine. However, to me this exemplified a few important realizations in wine. First, that a “lesser” year can produce wines that far outclass “great” years (compare this to 2005), especially if you are looking for restraint in your wines. Second, that a region can be reinvented with the proper vineyard management and wine making practices. Cornas has been known for a long time as the kingdom of gamey and brett infused syrah. No longer. Domaine Courbis’s Cornas are elegant, structured, beautifully rendered and filled with superb syrah flavours like bacon fat, olives, violets, and plum. This is the kind of wine that proves to me that Syrah is the greatest grape in the world and the one that best expresses its terroir. $60 at Marquis.

4. Russian River Temptation

That’s right, this is not a wine, but rather, a beer. I had the most recent batch of this down in Sonoma during the Wine Blogger’s Conference. Sean, Graham and I hit up the Russian River Brew Pub (an absolute mecca for beer lovers), and had $3 pints of some of the best beers being brewed in the world today. The Temptation is insane – so much so that all three of us were blown away. First off, it is aged in wine barrels. Second, this is made with wild brettanomyces yeasts that would turn most wines into unquaffable nightmares, but turned this beer into a sour masterpiece of the brewer’s art. The brewer’s father was in the wine business and so I think he understands a level of complexity in the art of fine alcohol that many brewers are still trying to accomplish. I also think this is the sort of beer you could and should give a wine geek to make them realize that a great beer blows away so many wines that cost a ton more money. Russian River is, I think, the best brewery in the world today. $25 a 750ml bottle at the brewery (also available at fine beer stores in the U.S.).

3. Brown Estate Chiles Valley Zinfandel 2007

I knew that a Brown Estate wine had to make it on this list. My experiences there this year showed me the humanity behind the wine industry and exposed me to a winery where everyone involved was authentic, sincere, and incredibly kind. Given my recent posts on honesty in wine, I think Brown Estate is the exemplar of what honesty can be in the Napa Valley. They also have an incedible estate well off the beaten track in the cooler Chiles Valley AVA. So, why did I choose this wine over their incredible chardonnay or other single vineyard zins? Well, because I tasted the 2007 Chiles Valley zinfandel on three separate occasions and on each occasion I was completely floored by this wine. This changed my preconceptions about zinfandel and this is the kind of wine that will make many confront any biases they have towards this grape. Absolutely insane acidity, one of the brightest and freshest palates I’ve ever experienced in California amongst all varietals, and a level of sheer mind-blowing pleasure that almost no wine achieves for me these days. Zinfandel is not a jammy flabby beast. No, when done as well as this it can hold its 15%+ ABV with the deftness and finesse of a tightrope walker, and yet deliver a level of fruit that other grapes could only dream of. Brown Estate, thanks for restoring my faith in both integrity and in the sheer joy of wine. $45 at the winery.

2. Tissot Chardonnay “Les Graviers” 2006

Jura wines are starting to get a lot of hype in the blogosphere and the wine geek community. I first had a Jacques Puffeney Trousseau down in San Francisco early in the year and it really impressed me with its fruit forwardness, but also profound delicacy, something sadly missing in most California wines. But it wasn’t that wine that made the list, or even Tissot’s own Trousseau, which is great. No, it was this single vineyard chardonnay with a touch of age on it. This is unlike any chardonnay I had ever tasted up to this point. In fact, I would even go so far as to call this genre-busting chardonnay. When is the last time you tasted carrots and celery in a chard, along with grass and licorice, and have it still blow your mind? This is not green, not over oaked, not like anything else out there. And yet, even with all its weirdness, it has a fundamental approachability that makes it utterly compelling. Hands down one of the best chardonnays I have ever tasted and a confirmation of the greatness of Jura. All in all, a wine well deserving of the second highest spot on the list. $60 at Kits Wine Cellars.

1. Didier Dagueneau Buisson Renard 2005

Writing down the number one wine on the list reminds me of when I took my first sip of this wine with my really good friend Martin – a white wine fanatic. We each sniffed, took a sip, turned to each other and said “Holy Shit”. I didn’t think wine could taste this good? And I already think wine is the tastiest stuff on earth. Is this really Sauvignon Blanc? Can it really have this absolutely insane depth of concentration and yet such profound acidity? Can it be light and full at the same time? Can this pair with the richest and creamiest of dishes but also just as perfectly with the waning summer air? I didn’t even realize wine could be this balanced. Needless to say, I went to great lengths to secure myself an allocation of Dagueneau’s last vintage (the 2007’s) before he sadly passed away. But, I’m sure that will only add to the legend. This was the easiest wine for me to pick on this list, and the most clearly deserving of the top wine of the year. This is the third Loire wine on this year’s list, coming from Pouilly Fumé – and damn it’s even better than the other two. If you can get your hands on anything by Dagueneau, you owe it to yourself to move the earth to make it happen. $70 at Marquis.

And that’s my top 10 wines of the year. I hope that my experiences can add to yours and if anyone has tried any of these wines I would love to hear your perspective on them. Cheers, and good drinking over the holiday period!

2 Comments


A Graduation Worth Remembering

The lack of posts over the last four days stems from the occurrence of a significant event in my life. I have just officially graduated law school. Not only did I graduate, but I was honoured by being selected by the Faculty of Law to give a speech at convocation on behalf of the graduating class. Rather than focus on personal achievement and massive celebration, I chose to remind us all that it took many small events and encounters with other people to get us all where we are today. And, that going forward in the future it will be incumbant on us as professionals to be neighbours to the strangers that will fill our professional lives.

All this focus on ethical duties and professional dignity made for a heartfelt event that I’ll remember for a long time to come. Luckily, soon after the ceremony I headed down to Seattle for the celebration. And, I suppose just as I have felt a significant change in my sense of self and sense of the world moving from student to professional, I suppose my choices of wines to celebrate with also mark a transition in the style of wines I drink and the approach I take to sipping the tasty juice of fermented grapes. Whereas I used to focus on trying to taste great examples of what every region across the world was famous for, I have now started to set my sites on the lesser known and uniquely produced wines. It is these sorts of wines that have become emblematic to me of the benefits of being open minded and always willing to learn and explore.

But, that’s enough pontificating, right? On to some wines! After driving down to Seattle in the afternoon and braving the border on the infamous Black Friday, I settled into the Pan Pacific by popping downstairs to Whole Foods and picking up dinner and booze for the evening.

taurasiHaving just had an amazing 1999 Aglianico Taurasi Riserva recently from Kits, when I saw another 1999 Aglianico Taurasi Riserva on the shelf I had to jump at the chance for a comparative tasting. This example came from Azienda Agricola “contrade di Taurasi” di Enza Lonardo, which seems to be either a small family winery  in Sicily or a small farmers collective. These guys have been around since 1998, and plant all their wines in the volcanic soil of their small 4 hectares of vineyards. This wine had 4 months maceration, and 24 months in tonneau, 6 months in steel, and  approximately 18 months in bottle. While not quite as complex as the Mastroberardino Radici I had recently, this was still extremely tasty wine, with great acidic balance and tons of fresh berries and earth. It went amazingly well not just with pizza, but surprisingly, with ginger mashed yams. In fact, the pairing with the yams was one of the most amazing pairings I’ve had in years – with the ginger bringing out the baking spice elements of the wine in amazing fashion, and the acid in the wine cutting through the heavy cream and butter in the mash. So goood. This was $60 and I’d give it a rating of Very Good+.

champagneBut, of course you cannot properly celebrate without a bottle of champagne. The champagne I chose was biodynamically farmed, came from Agraparte & Fils, and went by the name of Terroirs. It was made from Grand Cru fruit and was very easy drinking. A thick mid-palate with cream and nuts. Not quite as complex as the best grower champagne, it certainly went down really really well, especially in a luxury jacuzzi. Very Good+. $37 for a half bottle.

I think I also had a bottle of Deschutte’s Jubelale, which was a really tasty xmas beer, but I can’t remember too much about that one ;) .

carignanThe next day I headed over to Esquin, an awesome wine store in Seattle, and grabbed a bottle for dinner at Spinasse (an awesome Piedmontese restaurant with killer pasta). Despite all the Washington wine options, I had to choose the Le Roc Des Anges “1903″ Old Vine Carignan 2005, made in the Languedoc region of France. The winemaker apprenticed at Domaine Gauby, one of the best producers in the region, and I was enticed to try a 100% Carignan that supposedly did not taste like crap. Welp, the European Wine Buyer at Esquin (who convinced me to get this) was bang on. Amazing juice. Really approachable, with tons of fresh and clean black berry fruit, maybe a little cherry and plum, and a nice dose of earth and a hint of game. It was a fantastic pairing for the rabbit liver pasta I ordered and I will attest to this being the best darn Carignan I’ve ever tasted. Made from 100+ year old vines (planted in 1903, hence the name). Get it if you can find it. Excellent. $45 at Esquin.

IPAOf course, with one day left in the weekend, and needing a relaxing evening after driving back from Seattle, I popped open a very cool IPA I brought back from the U.S. to go with some very tasty Meinhardt Indian food. The Double-Wide India Pale Ale from Boulevard Brewing was a bottle conditioned and superbly made IPA from Missouri, boasting tons of pine, flowers, and incredible freshness. Drinking fresh IPA really proves to me that IPA must be consumed as quickly as possible. This was also really balanced, and avoided the over the top IBU’s that I tend to hate in the over-hopped styles. It’s also a testament to why choice of hops is key as the cascade hops they use are some of the best around. Excellent. $10 / 750ml.

And, last but not least is a bottle I’ve been aging ever since finishing first year law school and heading down to Napa to celebrate. The plan was to open this on graduation, and well, I stuck to the plan:

port

This bottle, an Imagery wine, is a “port”, or fortified dessert wine, made from Petite Sirah grapes in Paso Robles. Imagery is the side project of Benziger, and focuses on making small production wines that often buck trends. This port was really really smooth, with perfect balance of acidity and sugar. And, while lacking the same complexity as a vintage port, it was really just damn tasty. Tons of blueberry (as is common for Petite Sirah), and chocolate and coffee. The tannins came out with air, and the sulphur reduction I nosed to begin with faded with a good decant. Not a perfect wine, but much better with chocolate than traditional port, and really, just super duper tasty. Very Good+. $?.

So, in the end this was a super fun weekend in Seattle and graduating, and I think all the wines I drank provided ample celebration for this once in a lifetime achievement. Woo!

8 Comments


Honesty in Wine: An Inquiry – Part 3

virtueThe first two posts in this series dealt with two dimensions of honesty: truth and morality. Truth insofar as to be honest can mean to be genuine, and morality insofar as to be honest can mean to be authentic, consistent and sincere. This final post will try to bring together the ideas I’ve already discussed in a comprehensive approach to honesty that gets at the heart of what honesty means to wine.

The best way I could think of to do this was to bring in some suggestions from a brand of ethics known as virtue ethics. I do not mean to make this a treatise on virtue ethics, nor am I promoting it as the best moral system for all questions. Instead, I think it can provide some very useful insights to the question at hand: how is honesty a virtue?

3. Honesty as Virtue

Virtue ethics is an approach to ethics that emphasizes moral character, in contrast to an approach which emphasizes duties or rules (deontology) or that which emphasizes the consequences of actions (consequentialism), both of which I discussed in the second post in this series.

As a vinously-inspired example, consider a winemaker who is deciding between going fully biodynamic in their vineyards. A utilitarian would point to the fact that doing so would maximize well-being, perhaps here understood as overall health of humans and a diffuse entity known as the “environment”. A deontologist would point to the fact that doing so would be acting in accordance with some moral rule, such as “human interference with nature should be minimized to the greatest extent possible”.

Unlike these two approaches a virtue ethicist would consider the fact that making biodynamic wine is in itself an honest act. So the question remains, how can we understand what it means to make choices based on virtues as ends, and how can we determine the content of those virtues?

In the previous two posts, I have pointed to some ways in which we are able to give content to the word, and now the virtue, “honesty”. But those inquiries seem somehow insufficient in themselves. We need some way to make decisions in a complex and comprehensive environment. This ultimately leads us to ask what are the moral reasons for acting one way or another?

Virtue, and in our case, honesty, cannot be determined merely with reference to a single action. An honest person cannot be identified simply as one who, for example, does not cheat. If one acts merely because he or she thinks that honesty is the best policy, or because he or she fears being caught out, rather than through recognizing “To do otherwise would be dishonest” as the relevant reason, they are not the actions of an honest person.

A winemaker is not honest simply because he or she makes wine organically, or because he or she is worried about selling wine and so engages the larger community. And, let’s be honest, most of us are pretty savvy at discerning who is genuinely engaging with us and who is not.

Thus, instead, to possess a virtue is to be a certain sort of person who accepts a certain range of considerations as reasons for acting. And, what I have attempted to do in the first two posts is provide as many “reasons for acting” as possible. For example, to be consistent, to be sincere, or to be transparent and genuine.

This is why there is no set criteria for honesty – only a variety of reasons for acting that an honest individual considers when he or she makes his or her choices. To be honest is to be comprehensively attuned to this great variety of reasons for acting that are associated with honesty. Pure consequences, pure actions, truth-telling, consistency, etc. are all components of the virtue of honesty, but each in itself cannot determine the meaning of honesty. Honesty is the comprehensive consideration of all these reasons for acting within a given set of circumstances. Thus honesty can be diverse, multi-faceted and, in the end, is not discernable by reference to a basic set of criteria.

For example, a winemaker makes decisions every day about how to tend to the vines, the vineyard, and to every step along the way in the wine making process. Wineries also make decisions about how to market, how to distribute, how to price, and how to communicate their story. Each of these decisions, if they are to be honest, must be made with a comprehensive analysis of all the factors that comprise honesty in that situation. The ones I have suggested in the first two post provide some guidance to the sorts of considerations that an ‘honest’ person might make.

Honesty, from the perspective of a virtue ethics, is something to be assessed “in the thick of things”, as choices are being made, and with access to the full context of decisions.

Thus, an honest person’s reasons and choices with respect to honest and dishonest actions reflect his or her views about honesty and truth. Accordingly, it is impossible to easily classify someone or something as honest or dishonest. These assessments will always be dependent on the comprehensive criteria we use to determine what honesty is, and the weight we give to each criterion in a given situation.

So perhaps all I’ve done is point out that it’s really darn hard to decide whether or not someone is being honest or that something is honest. I do think this is a worthwhile exercise, however, because it highlights care in the way that we assess both our actions and the actions of others. We must think comprehensively and in context, with reference to a full gamut of reasons for acting, if we are to, ourselves, honestly assess another’s honesty.

Perhaps it is this end that best exemplifies that wine is more about dialogue and less about judgment. Judgment can be a part of dialogue, but only if it engages perspectives fully and honestly. Thus honesty in wine should apply not just to producers, but also to consumers, marketers, and everyone involved in the wine business. If we are to think of wine as more than a mere commodity, I think it is incumbent on all of us not only to be as broad minded as possible, but also to be willing to engage in debate and dialogue about what makes a wine honest. This, I hope, will help make everyone a little more honest themselves.

29 Comments



SetPageWidth