Spotlight on New Zealand: Craggy Range Le Sol Syrah 2005

I’ve been pretty excited about the New Zealand Syrahs I’ve tasted in this spotlight. This wine, however, has proven to be somewhat of an enigma.

A New Zealand Giant

Craggy Range is one of the bigger names in Hawke’s Bay – 200,000 cases – which is not huge by standards outside of New Zealand, but within New Zealand it is quite considerable. Founded in the late 1980’s, Craggy Range has helped bring considerable success to the Hawke’s Bay region and has since expanded all over New Zealand, with wines made from grapes grown in Marlborough to Central Otago.

The Le Sol, however, is from Craggy Range’s “prestige” range of wines that supposedly represent the absolute best of what they do and what the Hawke’s Bay can produce.

Gimblett Gravels, the Hawke’s Bay sub-region from which this Syrah sprouts, is also considered by many to be the best region for Syrah in New Zealand – an ancient river bed with sedimentary soils. It is certainly the warmest, which helps make wines made from these soils some of the densest and richest in the country.

A Confused Wine or a Confused Tasting

The Le Sol comes in two parts – pop and pour and decanted. Surprisingly, the impact of decanting on this wine proved to be in reverse to what is traditional: it became more one dimensional and monolithic and lost the aromatic complexity and fresh palate I experienced upon initial opening.

On the initial open, this offered plenty of game and pepper, pouring a very youthful deep red. I thought these aromatics were so much more interesting than any of the big boy Syrahs from the U.S. and Australia.This changed, however, with the decant as the oak took over the fruit.

The same occurred on the palate. Initially a wine with juicy blackberry, plum, pepper, a hint of game and great freshness. This had mouthwatering acidity and exceptional length, finishing with herbs, garrigue and fine tannins. Strangely, with the decant this became all oak, which dried out the fruit on the finish. I cannot understand how such an expressive, fresh and complex wine could become so simplistic and monolithic with only a couple hours of air, but this is what happened.

As such, I find this a difficult wine to rate, and I’m not sure what to make of it, though at the price I can’t recommend it over the Sacred Hill or Man O War. Nonetheless, here it is:

Very Good+ to Excellent upon Pop and Pour
Fair with a Decant
$100 at Kits Wine Cellar

Spotlight on Washington Syrah: Charles Smith Wines Skull Syrah 2005

I could spend time in this post discussing the terroir of the Columbia Valley AVA where the grapes for Charles Smith’s Skull Syrah were grown – but doing so would not be true to what’s going on with this wine.

Rock Star Terroir

Charles Smith is a self styled rock-star winemaker with several brands: from the cheap Magnificent Wine Company bottlings like House Wine and Boom Boom Syrah to the K Syrah bottlings which include many interesting single vineyard Syrahs to the uber-premium Charles Smith Wines bottlings such as this Skull, and also the Heart syrah.

The rock-star moniker does make some level of sense given his years managing rock bands in Copenhagen. Perhaps fittingly, Smith became friends with Christophe Baron, winemaker and owner of Cayuse, who encouraged him to start making wine, as there are no two styles that are more diametrically opposed.

To preempt my criticism of his style of winemaking, I am obliged to also recognize that Charles Smith has perhaps done more for Syrah in Washington than almost anyone, except perhaps Mr. Baron himself. And you have to admit Mr. Smith’s marketing has been outstanding. But what of the wines?

Sui Generis “Wine”

An important caveat here is that this is decidedly not a review of the K syrah bottlings, many of which I quite enjoy. The top end Charles Smith wines are sui generis, that is, unique unto themselves. They are also guaranteed to be some of the most controversial being made in Washington today.

The nose is mind-bending in a non-superlative sort of way. It is very rich and extracted with some heavy volatile acids and obscuring dry extract that makes you wonder what happened to the fruit this was made from.

The palate is outrageously massive and almost astringently alcoholic – I taste soy, tar and ripe but obfuscating tannin. As over the top as this wine is, it does retain a smidgen of promise that it might turn into something fascinating with age. And fascinating must be understood in its Vulcan-like neutral capacity. As Allen Meadows mentioned in one of our conversations, a freak of nature can catch your attention, but might not be compelling or enticing over time.

This is what I would call a food unfriendly wine to the point that I’m not even sure one can or should call this wine. In fact, even after a day of air this tastes more like sweetly flavoured alcohol and extract than fruit.

So how to rate this? It is hard to understand and truly is its own thing. It is also the epitome of Charles Smith’s style, even though in my opinion vastly inferior to the wines from K Syrah.

What does this mean for Washington Syrah? Well, it certainly can play the marketing and points game as much as anyone, and it is certainly fascinating to see what “rock star” winemakers can produce. But let’s hope this is an experimental approach that will eventually be abandoned for a more terroir and fruit driven approach.

Fair to Good
$120 USD, $80 CDN at Everything Wine

Delas St. Esprit Cotes du Rhone 2007

IMG_3756As anyone who has spent any time reading about wine in the last year likely knows, Robert Parker has declared the 2007 vintage in the Southern Rhone to be the best he has ever tasted. Wines are getting crazy scores from him in this vintage, all the way down to the basic Cotes du Rhone bottlings, like this one. I’ve always been a Rhone fan, particularly for their ability to pair with game, and given the price on this wine I thought it would be worth a try. Robert Parker scored this 90 points.

I don’t get the 2007 vintage scores yet. I am still waiting on the Chateauneufs, which are all too young to drink now, but for me 2007 has not been consistent at all at the low end. The 2007 Cotes du Rhone from St. Cosme is modern, fruity, balanced and clean and a great value for a big winter wine. This, on the other hand is a bit of a mess – even gunky – with too much brett. I recently tasted the Montfaucon 2007 and it had similar characteristics.

The nose had lots of red and black cherry with a touch of herbs and earth. The palate exhibited considerable spice, suggesting maybe over-use of oak here, and also black pepper, cherry, and a minerally gamey finish. In theory this sounds good, but this is an example of where flavour is not everything, and in fact, without the appropriate structural components, cannot keep a wine together. The flavours start to fall apart and dis-integrate after a while, fatiguing the palate not through alcohol (this is 13.5%), but through an unpleasant integration on the finish. The wine is somewhat gunky too, it just doesn’t sit cleanly on the palate. Maybe Parker fell for the fruit in this one, but so much else doesn’t work. Is this an example of the vintage gone wrong? Could the wines be somewhat messy and overly-viscous? Will they lack integration in a few years? I’m curious to see how the Chateauneufs and Gigondas fair. I’m always wary of vintage of the century declarations, and so far, based on the CDR wines, I’m wary of the 2007 vintage in the Southern Rhone.

Fair
$18 at BCLDB

Dogfish Head Festina Peche

IMG_3703A brief note today for this beer made with peach juice from concentrate. I guess Dogfish Head was going for refreshing, but they got unbalanced muck in the end. This pours a very pale yellow, and smells like a light wheat ale. The palate is pretty much equivalent to canned peaches pureed into a basic wheat beer and a high level of acidity/tartness. It’s a simple beer that just didn’t come together well for me.

Fair
$4 / 375ml at Brewery Creek

Shmaltz Brewing Coney Island Human Blockhead

IMG_3586I’ve written about the diversity of lager before, and the unfortunate dominance of mass market beer in the lager department. Shmaltz Brewing is taking the challenge, though, with their Coney Island line of lagers in a myriad of styles. Unfortunately, this particular iteration did not work for me and felt quite unbalanced compared to the basic Coney Island Lager or the Albino Python.

This poured a very dark cloudy reddish-brown with a big 1.5″ head: not at all reminiscent of your standard macro-lager. The nose was perhaps a bit too malty, though, and that sweetness persisted on the palate with cherries, banana, rootbeer, brown sugar and spice. This beer is like an overly-happy person who seems great at first glance but begins to wear on you at an exponential rate. The beer is pretty tasty on the first sip, but loses its charm with a few more. It’s too bad, but I still highly recommend Shmaltz’ other lager offerings.

Fair
$9/22oz @ Brewery Creek

Gallante Vineyards Estate Cabernet Sauvignon 2006

I get excited about small producers, especially those from lesser regions. I find that the QPR on these wines can be great, and they also often surprise a jaded palate with new textures and flavours. There is, however, always a risk with seeking out the small vineyards. When you have less money, less experience and lesser land, sometimes the wine just, well, sucks.

Here we have a Carmel Valley California Cabernet – not a very common combination of region and variety. The nose seemed a little baked to me with red berries and alcohol. This was not a typical Cab nose. On the palate I found this a rather light-bodied Cabernet with some astringency on the finish and greenness in the palate. Awkwardly built and unbalanced this very woody wine just didn’t work. Too bad – I had high hopes.

Fair
$40 at Steamworks Liquor Store

Ben Marco Malbec 2005

A gift from a friend giving me a lesson in South American Terroir. I found this Argentian (Mendoza) Malbec plummy, with a small amount of earthiness and very smooth if maybe somewhat flabby tannins. Simple but pleasant. Very sweet, though – but this paired well with the Dominos Pizza I ate with it (what can I say? I don’t always go upscale), which has sweetened tomato sauce. Nothing special, though – but a good lesson in what you get from Mendoza at this price point. I also imagine this would appeal to those who are still transitioning from sugared wines to dry wines (the extreme fruit-forwardness gives the wine the impression of sweetness).

Fair

~$25

Chateau de Montfaucon "Baron Louis" Cotes Du Rhone 2005

It’s bound to happen. At some point. Against all my expectations this was one of the worst wines I’ve had in recent memory. This came highly recommended as a Cotes du Rhone made in the Chateauneuf du Pape style (blending Chateauneuf varieties) from a single vineyard across the river from CdP and in a great vintage. And, amazingly, this vineyard is owned by a former member of the winemaking team at none other than Domaine du Vieux Telegraphe.

The nose was very simple and slight – a hint of red berry. Palate-wise this was all sour-cherry and boring. Too acidic and poor balance. Overall this was actually hard to drink and it took a few days and two people to get it all down (and with food). After an hour decanting it opened a bit and the fruit was a little more concentrated. So, while not gross, I cannot recommend this to anyone. I hear the 2004 was better.

Fair
$35 at Kitsilano Wine Cellars

Burgans Albarino 2006

I was looking for a wine to pair with some halibut and was recommended to try a Spanish Albarino. Always being one who likes something new, and since I’d never had Albarino before I thought it would be fun to give this wine a try.

Albarino is grown in the Rias Baixas region of north west Spain and is neither fermented nor aged in wood. This is meant to give them a unique flavour profile and texture. While this is definitely true of this particular wine, I can’t say I think this is a great example of the varietal, even though I haven’t tasted others yet. The wine is tangy orange with a smooth texture, but it is supremely simple and, honestly, I found it to be pretty boring. Nevertheless it was much better than your average bottle of white at this price level and is a decent quaffing wine, albeit not an exciting one. Nonetheless, I am definitely going to be seeking out some more serious Albarinos in the future, since its uniqueness is pretty intriguing.

Fair
$20 at BCLDB


Fuller’s Vintage Ale 2007

I generally like Fuller’s ales, and so when I saw this limited edition vintage ale at the local BC liquor store I was excited to give it a try. These are bottle fermeted and supposedly age well; however, I found this beer to be overly alcoholic and not balanced very well. Maybe with time the intense alcohol flavour will mellow, but this was very dissapointing and very overpriced.

$6.99 at BCLDB
Fair